Attacking,Defending or Universal?

 Attacking,Defencive or Universal?

I think I'm an opportunistic player. If I see good attacking or defensive move I do it, but most of the time I don't see the good moves!

 One starts seeing the good ones as one gains experience.Opportunism is the very core of chess.

Always exploit your opponents positional weaknesses (as long as they're not mine!). One's tactical blows (forks, pins, skewers, disc. checks) always depend on another's weak moves.

Yes, hotdog, I have seen many of your games and have noticed that you are definetely an attacking player, particularly as you have so very many games in which you have won via the 3-move scholars mate. Your a marvel.

#4
Posted By:
cdare
27 Mar, 10:17

Always exploit your opponents positional weaknesses (as long as they're not mine!). One's tactical blows (forks, pins, skewers, disc. checks) always depend on another's weak moves.
    You have awareness about the finer points of chess.Thanks for responding.

TO ALL GREAT PLAYERS......As my games with Eiche123,are coming to the end ,I hereby ADMIT that I've played the WORST MIDDLE GAMES IN MY CAREER....SIMPLE moves with 2 widely open EYES...R MORE THAN ENOUGH TO BEAT HIM...

i fumble my way through all my  games if i beat someone it is by chance
is fumbling a tactic haha

i think im Universal,,because i only base my moves from the opponents' moves..

I understand what u r implying to hotdog jeje........ smooth.....

Always attacking

Anyone who attacks when defense is in order, or defends when there is the opportunity to attack will most likely lose, unless his opponent is equally inept at assessing the positional requirements.

I'm not good in chess. I just play chess for fun and make more new friends. Just call me Ray.
Ray Duque III
New York City

Good Players LOSE by excess of effort-vaulting ambition o'erleaps itself-or by impatience in good positions-or relaxing when there is still work to be done.